Carbon Capture and Storage Laser Talk

Question:  How does carbon capture and storage fit into this policy?

Answer:  Carbon dioxide (CO₂) that is removed from an emissions source and then ‘sequestered’ from the atmosphere doesn’t contribute to global warming or ocean acidification. [1] That’s why the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act [2] offers carbon fee refunds for CO₂ captured and sequestered from fossil fuel combustion. Operators of the sequestration sites must guarantee the safety and permanence of their CO₂ storage.

Various terms have been used in reference to this concept – ‘carbon capture’ or ‘CO₂ capture’ for the first step, and ‘storage’ or ‘sequestration’ for the second. They all mean the same thing, and in all cases are referred to as ‘CCS’. The source of the CO₂ could be a power plant, a refinery, a chemical plant, or any fossil-fueled source where CO₂ would otherwise be vented to the atmosphere.

Scrubbing CO₂ out of industrial gases is widely used for engineering purposes, [3] and limited amounts have been sold for enhanced oil recovery, [4] but CCS has not been deployed at commercial scale for environmental reasons because there is no financial reward for doing so. That will change with this policy.

Potential destinations for large amounts of CO₂ are in depleted oil and gas reservoirs or deep underground formations where it gradually combines with existing minerals. [5] Recent research has also shown that a common rock called basalt can react with CO₂ more quickly than previously expected. [6]

Many studies of potential routes to decarbonization, including REMI, [7] the Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project, [8] and the World Bank, [9] consider CCS as one of the technology options likely to play some role. If done safely and permanently, CCS can help cut emissions while facilitating an orderly transition away from fossil energy.

This page was updated on 01/15/2019 at 10:10 CST.