This page was updated on 05/10/18 20:09 CDT. Answer: There are two serious climate issues with tar sands oil. First, producing fuels from tar sands emits more CO2 than production from conventional crude oil. Tar sand crude – also referred to as bitumen – can’t be drilled and pumped like regular oil, but must be mined or “steamed” out of the ground, heated, and separated from the sand. [1] Even then, it can’t be put into a pipeline until it’s diluted with thinner, lighter hydrocarbons, and refining it takes an extra step called cracking. All of this energy-intensive processing makes its life-cycle emissions 8 to 37 percent higher than conventional crude oil. [2] Second, development of so-called “unconventional” fuels like tar sands adds to the worldwide pool of carbon that is likely to be burned. If all of the known tar sands are exploited, they would add almost 700 billion barrels [3,4] to world oil reserves of a little over 1500 billion barrels. [5] The Carbon Fee and Dividend proposal, because of its predictably rising price signal, would tend to steer investment capital away from more carbon-intensive resources like tar sands, making it less likely that they would ever be burned.Tar Sands Oil Laser Talk
Question: How will Carbon Fee & Dividend affect oil from tar sands?
Tar Sands Oil
Are You Ready to Solve Climate Change?
Join Citizens' Climate Lobby!